Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Hubpickr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
Cricket
vs
Metro by T-Mobile :
107 Highlights & 31 Differences —
So, Which Internet Service Provider Actually Works Better
Comparison of unlimited data options and throttling speeds helps you pick the right carrier.
We lined up Cricket and Metro by T-Mobile by real-world value. Dive into their firewall support, ddos protection, device-level protection & average resolution time and choose the internet service provider that works for you.
Cricket vs Metro by T-Mobile: A Detailed Unlimited Wireless Service Comparison
When choosing between Cricket and Metro by T-Mobile, many users will find striking commonalities along with key differences that cater to various needs. Both providers support up to 5 users, offer coverage suitable for indoor and outdoor environments, and serve multiple property types like homes, apartments, offices, and retail spaces.
They operate on a fixed wireless last-mile technology with a fiber optic backbone, providing nationwide availability without infrastructure requirements. Both services offer unlimited data plans with no monthly data caps, support the latest WiFi 6 standard, and enable easy self-installation with no wall drilling or technician entry necessary.
Security is robust on both ends, featuring DDoS protection, firewall support, and minimal traffic logging policies, while customer support is rated good and includes remote troubleshooting. Though their general frameworks align, the main differences lie in pricing, speed, streaming quality, encryption standards, and network freshness.
Cricket: The Value-Packed Budget Provider
Cricket delivers a compelling option for cost-conscious consumers seeking reliable wireless service without breaking the bank. Priced at $15 at Cricket Wireless, it is an economical choice that does not sacrifice essential features. The download speed ranges between 25 and 100 Mbps, adequate for HD streaming, gaming, work-from-home tasks, and general browsing. While its 4K streaming rating is fair, it remains functional for casual 4K content consumption.
One of Cricket's standout features is the presence of a 7-day trial period, allowing users a risk-free trial before fully committing. Its throttling threshold is at 22 GB, and when data throttling kicks in, speeds drop to 1 Mbps, which aligns with industry standards. The network infrastructure has been around for about a decade (10 years), indicating a mature but reliable system. Its encryption uses AES-128, which, while secure, is less robust than newer standards. Billing communications are versatile, offering notifications via email, SMS, and the app, giving users multiple ways to stay informed.
Metro by T-Mobile: Premium Performance and Modern Infrastructure
On the other side, Metro by T-Mobile targets users who prioritize speed and streaming quality, boasting a significantly higher price point at $40 at Metro by T-Mobile. This premium-level service offers download speeds from 25 up to a sturdy 200-500 Mbps, ideal for power users requiring seamless 4K streaming and heavy data usage, as reflected in its good 4K streaming rating. Users benefit from a throttling threshold set at 35 GB, allowing more data throughput before speeds are reduced.
The Metro network runs on newer infrastructure around five years old and employs AES-256 encryption, doubling the security strength compared to Cricket. Its congestion handling capacity is higher at a score of 80 versus Cricket's 70, indicating potentially smoother performance during busy network periods.
Metro also supports port availability, which Cricket lacks, opening possibilities for advanced networking setups. Its customer communication channels include SMS and app notifications, though it lacks email alerts. While there is no trial period, Metro provides a reliable service aimed at users with demanding connectivity needs.
Quick Take
Cricket shines with budget-conscious customers thanks to its affordable $15 price point and user-friendly 7-day risk-free trial, making it a great choice for moderate internet usage and typical household activities. Meanwhile, Metro by T-Mobile delivers superior speed, better 4K streaming, enhanced encryption, and a fresher network setup tailored for intensive streaming, gaming, and larger data requirements.
Bottom Line
For those aiming to stretch every dollar while maintaining stable connectivity for everyday activities, Cricket is a solid, cost-effective option with flexible trial terms. However, if you demand faster speeds, stronger encryption, and better mixing of performance for streaming or work-from-home applications, and you don't mind paying extra, the investment in Metro by T-Mobile is justified by a noticeably improved user experience and network quality.
Verdict
Winner: Metro by T-Mobile - Offers superior speeds, better 4K streaming quality, and stronger AES-256 encryption, powered by newer infrastructure that enhances overall network reliability and congestion handling.
Runner-Up: Cricket - Provides budget-friendly pricing with a useful 7-day trial and solid performance fit for moderate users and those new to fixed wireless unlimited plans.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Trying to find the better online service? This internet service providers guide lines up Cricket vs Metro by T-Mobile with real-world insight on firewall support, ddos protection, device-level protection & average resolution time and user experiences.
Cricket and Metro by T-Mobile both support a maximum of 5 users, making them equally suitable for small households or offices with similar user capacity needs.
Shows how many simultaneous users the plan can reasonably support.
In the battle of Max Supported Users,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Supported Users on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
25
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Home, Apartment, Office, Retail
vs
Supported Property Types
Both services cater to a wide range of property types like home, apartment, office, and retail, providing flexibility in deployment in various residential and commercial settings.
Indicates which property types the ISP supports.
In the battle of Supported Property Types,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported Property Types on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Cricket offers a service tier simply labeled 'Unlimited' while Metro by T-Mobile brands theirs as 'Unlimited Plans'; both imply no data caps, ideal for heavy internet users.
Identifies the marketing or tier label of the ISP plan.
In the battle of Service Tier Name,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Service Tier Name on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Service Type
What is the service type?
24
Cricket
0Votes
Residential
15
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Residential
Cricket
This internet service targets the residential market, catering primarily to home users.
Metro by T-Mobile
Service is aimed at Residential customers, meaning offerings and support are tailored for home use rather than enterprise deployments.
Defines the general classification of the ISP plan.
In the battle of Service Type,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Service Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
60
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Streaming, Gaming, Work-from-home, Browsing
vs
Use Case Type
Cricket and Metro by T-Mobile support the same use cases including streaming, gaming, work-from-home, and browsing, ensuring comprehensive service for common internet activities.
Describes the ideal intended usage scenarios.
In the battle of Use Case Type,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Use Case Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Network Architecture Overview
What is the network architecture overview?
44
Cricket
0Votes
Distributed
65
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Distributed
Cricket
The network architecture is Distributed, meaning resources and management are spread out rather than centralized, enhancing resilience and scalability.
An overview of the network architecture, indicating its structure and layout.
In the battle of Network Architecture Overview,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Network Architecture Overview on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Service Category
What is the service category?
94
Cricket
0Votes
Mobile Broadband
75
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Mobile Broadband
Cricket
Service category is Mobile Broadband, implying internet connectivity using cellular network technologies suitable for mobility.
Shows the broader service classification.
In the battle of Service Category,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Service Category on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
User Profile Recommendation
What is the recommended profile for the user?
24
Cricket
0Votes
No annual contract
55
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Based on Budget
The personalized recommendation for selecting the best service provider based on user-specific factors.
In the battle of User Profile Recommendation,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Profile Recommendation on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Connection Type
What is the connection type?
54
Cricket
0Votes
Fixed Wireless
55
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Fixed Wireless
Indicates the medium used to deliver the internet connection.
In the battle of Connection Type,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Target Customer Segment
What is the target customer segment?
24
Cricket
0Votes
Individuals, Families
20
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Individuals, Families
Defines who the plan is targeted toward.
In the battle of Target Customer Segment,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Target Customer Segment on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Ideal Environment
What is the ideal environment for the service?
29
Cricket
0Votes
Indoor, Outdoor
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Indoor, Outdoor
vs
Ideal Environment
Both Cricket and Metro by T-Mobile are designed for use in indoor and outdoor environments, offering versatile coverage suitable for various user locations.
The recommended environment for optimal service performance.
In the battle of Ideal Environment,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ideal Environment on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Max Supported Devices
How many devices are supported?
24
Cricket
0Votes
5
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
1+
Indicates how many devices can be connected without performance drops.
In the battle of Max Supported Devices,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Supported Devices on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Both providers offer nationwide availability, ensuring users across the country can access their services with similar geographic reach.
Specifies the scale of availability.
In the battle of Availability Type,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Availability Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Coverage Region
What is the coverage region?
64
Cricket
0Votes
National
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Urban, Rural, National
Cricket
The coverage region of this service is defined as National. This means connectivity is available across the entire country, suitable for users who require widespread access.
The geographical area where the service is available.
In the battle of Coverage Region,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Coverage Region on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Port Availability
Is there port availability?
No
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
1Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
vs
Port Availability
Cricket does not offer port availability whereas Metro by T-Mobile does, making Metro more advantageous for users who need physical connection options.
Indicates whether a physical port or connection line already exists at the address.
In the battle of Port Availability,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Based on community votes for Port Availability,
Cricket ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Metro offers port availability which Cricket lacks so Metro is better if you need advanced network setups.
See more
Service Qualification Requirement
What is the service qualification requirement?
34
Cricket
1Votes
Available
25
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Available
vs
Service Qualification Requirement
Both Cricket and Metro require service qualification availability, indicating that subscription depends on location suitability, which is a common standard for service assurance.
The conditions or criteria that need to be met to qualify for the service.
In the battle of Service Qualification Requirement,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Service Qualification Requirement,
Cricket ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉,
which got 0 votes.
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Single-family home, Apartment, Condo, Office
vs
Building Type Support
Cricket and Metro support a variety of building types including single-family homes, apartments, condos, and offices, which enhances usability across diverse living and working spaces.
Lists property structures that can be serviced.
In the battle of Building Type Support,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Building Type Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Infrastructure Requirement
What is the infrastructure requirement?
0
Cricket
0Votes
None
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
None
vs
Infrastructure Requirement
Neither Cricket nor Metro by T-Mobile require any infrastructure for service availability, simplifying setup for customers without additional hardware investments.
The necessary infrastructure required for the service to be available.
In the battle of Infrastructure Requirement,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Infrastructure Requirement on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Distance Limitation
What is the distance limitation?
0
ft
0Votes
0
ft
0Votes
Maximum supported distance from the network node or tower.
In the battle of Distance Limitation,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Distance Limitation on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Address Verification Method
What is the address verification method?
64
Cricket
0Votes
Database lookup
75
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Database lookup
Method used to confirm serviceability.
In the battle of Address Verification Method,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Address Verification Method on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Service Activation Eligibility
Is the service activation eligible?
44
Cricket
0Votes
Available
15
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Available
Whether the service is eligible for activation in a particular area or under certain conditions.
In the battle of Service Activation Eligibility,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Service Activation Eligibility on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Both Cricket and Metro by T-Mobile utilize wireless last-mile technology, providing similar network delivery methods leading to ease of installation and mobility.
Technology used between network node and the customer's premises.
In the battle of Last-Mile Technology,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Last-Mile Technology on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Secondary Technology
What is the secondary technology?
0
Cricket
0Votes
None
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
None
vs
Secondary Technology
Neither Cricket nor Metro have secondary network technologies, focusing solely on their primary fixed wireless technology for consistent service delivery.
Any supplementary technology supporting service delivery.
In the battle of Secondary Technology,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Secondary Technology on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Backbone Technology
What is the backbone technology used?
94
Cricket
0Votes
Fiber Optic
75
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Fiber Optic
vs
Backbone Technology
Backbone technology is fiber optic for both Cricket and Metro, providing high-speed network infrastructure capable of supporting robust data transmission.
The core infrastructure technology that carries data across the network.
In the battle of Backbone Technology,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backbone Technology on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
IPv4 Support
Is IPv4 supported?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
IPv4 support is included, ensuring compatibility with the longstanding internet protocol widely used globally.
Indicates the ISP supports IPv4 addressing.
In the battle of IPv4 Support,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IPv4 Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
IPv6 Support
Is IPv6 supported?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
IPv6 support is included, enabling connectivity with the latest internet addressing protocol for greater address space and improved routing.
Indicates the ISP supports IPv6 addressing.
In the battle of IPv6 Support,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IPv6 Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Dual-Stack Support
Is dual-stack supported?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
Dual-stack support indicates the service can handle both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols simultaneously, ensuring future-proof connectivity.
Shows if IPv4 and IPv6 run simultaneously.
In the battle of Dual-Stack Support,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual-Stack Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Channel Bonding Support
Is channel bonding supported?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Metro by T-Mobile
Channel bonding is not supported, which can limit combined throughput on certain access technologies compared to services that use bonding.
Whether multiple channels can be combined to increase throughput.
In the battle of Channel Bonding Support,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Channel Bonding Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Supported Network Protocols
What network protocols are supported?
59
Cricket
0Votes
DHCP, CGNAT
60
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
DHCP, CGNAT
vs
Supported Network Protocols
Cricket and Metro both support the DHCP and CGNAT network protocols, ensuring standard network configuration and management options.
Network protocols supported by the ISP.
In the battle of Supported Network Protocols,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Supported Network Protocols on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Network Topology
What is the network topology?
54
Cricket
0Votes
Point-to-Point
50
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Point-to-Point
Describes the structural layout of the network.
In the battle of Network Topology,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Network Topology on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Modulation Standard
What is the modulation standard?
84
Cricket
0Votes
OFDM
85
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
OFDM
Indicates the encoding method for transmitting data.
In the battle of Modulation Standard,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Modulation Standard on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Fiber Node Distance
What is the fiber node distance?
0
ft
0Votes
0
ft
0Votes
Distance from customer to fiber node, affecting performance.
In the battle of Fiber Node Distance,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fiber Node Distance on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
25
Metro by T-Mobile
1Votes
25-100 Mbps, 200-500 Mbps
vs
Download Speed
Cricket provides download speeds from 25-100 Mbps while Metro extends from 25-100 Mbps up to 200-500 Mbps, offering Metro a significant advantage in high-speed connections.
Maximum downstream bandwidth offered.
In the battle of Download Speed,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Download Speed,
Cricket ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Cricket's download speed between 25 and 100 Mbps is pretty solid for most users but Metro by T-Mobile's 200 to 500 Mbps range is a game changer if you need faster internet.
Both Cricket and Metro deliver excellent HD streaming performance, making either a great choice for users seeking high-quality video streaming experiences.
Performance level when streaming HD content.
In the battle of HD Streaming Performance Rating,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
HD Streaming Performance Rating on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Both services offer good cloud backup performance, facilitating reliable data backup and recovery options for users.
Evaluates performance for cloud data transfers.
In the battle of Cloud Backup Performance,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Backup Performance on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Upload Speed
What is the upload speed?
34
Cricket
0Votes
25-100 Mbps
55
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
25-100 Mbps
Metro by T-Mobile
Advertised upload speed tier includes 25-100 Mbps, suitable for common activities like video calls and cloud uploads.
Maximum upstream bandwidth offered.
In the battle of Upload Speed,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Upload Speed on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Typical Evening Speed
What is the typical evening speed?
25
Mbps
0Votes
100
Mbps
0Votes
Cricket
Typical evening speed is around 25 Mbps, which is adequate for standard internet tasks during peak usage hours.
Expected average speed during peak usage hours.
In the battle of Typical Evening Speed,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
75.0 Mbps
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Typical Evening Speed on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Real-World Throughput
What is the real-world throughput?
20
Mbps
0Votes
79
Mbps
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Real-world throughput is 79 Mbps, which reflects typical measured download capacity under normal conditions.
Average measured throughput during everyday usage.
In the battle of Real-World Throughput,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
59.0 Mbps
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Real-World Throughput on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Gaming Performance Rating
What is the gaming performance rating?
69
Cricket
0Votes
Good
60
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Good
Cricket
Gaming performance is rated as Good, indicating the service provides adequate bandwidth and low latency necessary for a smooth online gaming experience.
Rates suitability for online gaming.
In the battle of Gaming Performance Rating,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gaming Performance Rating on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
4K Streaming Performance Rating
What is the 4K streaming performance rating?
34
Cricket
0Votes
Fair
55
Metro by T-Mobile
1Votes
Good
vs
4K Streaming Performance Rating
For 4K streaming, Cricket rates fair while Metro by T-Mobile offers good performance, indicating Metro may better support ultra-high-definition streaming.
Rates performance for 4K video streaming.
In the battle of 4K Streaming Performance Rating,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
21 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for 4K Streaming Performance Rating,
Cricket ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Cricket has a throttling threshold at 22 GB, whereas Metro's threshold is higher at 35 GB, favoring Metro users who consume more data before speed reductions.
Data usage level at which speed reductions are applied.
In the battle of Throttling Threshold,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
13.0 GB
measurement.
Based on community votes for Throttling Threshold,
Cricket ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Neither Cricket nor Metro offer peak and off-peak quotas, allowing consistent data use regardless of time of day.
The difference in data usage allocation during peak and off-peak hours.
In the battle of Peak and Off-Peak Quota,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak and Off-Peak Quota on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Transparency Tools
What usage transparency tools are provided?
67
Cricket
0Votes
App Dashboard, Web Portal, SMS Alerts
65
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
App Dashboard, SMS Alerts
Cricket
Usage transparency tools include an App Dashboard, Web Portal, and SMS Alerts, allowing users to monitor their consumption effectively.
Metro by T-Mobile
Usage transparency is provided via App Dashboard and SMS Alerts, enabling customers to monitor consumption and receive notifications.
Tools available to monitor real-time data usage.
In the battle of Usage Transparency Tools,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Transparency Tools on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Prioritization Policy
What is the prioritization policy?
44
Cricket
0Votes
Standard Priority
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Standard Priority
Metro by T-Mobile
Traffic prioritization is set to Standard Priority, meaning typical latency and throughput handling without special prioritization for premium traffic.
Defines how the user’s traffic is prioritized during congestion.
In the battle of Prioritization Policy,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Prioritization Policy on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Data Rollover Availability
Is data rollover available?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Metro by T-Mobile
Data rollover is not available, so unused data does not carry forward to the next billing cycle.
Indicates whether unused data rolls over to the next month.
In the battle of Data Rollover Availability,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Data Rollover Availability on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Monthly Data Allowance
What is the monthly data allowance?
0
GB
0Votes
0
GB
0Votes
vs
Monthly Data Allowance
Neither Cricket nor Metro impose a monthly data allowance, confirming their commitment to truly unlimited data plans.
The amount of monthly data included in the plan.
In the battle of Monthly Data Allowance,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monthly Data Allowance on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Unlimited Data Availability
Is unlimited data available?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
vs
Unlimited Data Availability
Both Cricket and Metro offer unlimited data, ideal for heavy internet users who require unrestricted data usage without worrying about caps.
Indicates whether the plan supports unlimited data usage.
In the battle of Unlimited Data Availability,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Unlimited Data Availability on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Speed
What is the throttling speed?
1
Mbps
0Votes
1
Mbps
0Votes
vs
Throttling Speed
Both providers throttle speeds to 1 Mbps after thresholds are reached, ensuring manageable network performance during high usage.
Connection speed after throttling is triggered.
In the battle of Throttling Speed,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
equal
1.00 Mbps
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Speed on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Fair Use Policy Severity
What is the fair use policy severity?
44
Cricket
0Votes
Moderate
45
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Moderate
Indicates how aggressive the FUP restrictions are.
In the battle of Fair Use Policy Severity,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fair Use Policy Severity on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Data-Usage Notification
Are data-usage notifications available?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Indicates whether alerts are sent when usage approaches limits.
In the battle of Data-Usage Notification,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Data-Usage Notification on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Network Management Policy
What is the network management policy?
34
Cricket
0Votes
Throttling
45
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Throttling
The approach or strategy used to manage network traffic and ensure optimal performance.
In the battle of Network Management Policy,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Network Management Policy on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Heavy-Use Suitability
What is the heavy-use suitability?
64
Cricket
0Votes
Moderate Users
85
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Heavy Users
Indicates which user type the plan is suitable for.
In the battle of Heavy-Use Suitability,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heavy-Use Suitability on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Cricket nor Metro support mesh nodes, thus no possibility for extended mesh network setups from either provider.
Number of mesh nodes bundled with the plan.
In the battle of Number of Mesh Nodes,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Number of Mesh Nodes on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Modem Type
What is the modem type?
94
Cricket
0Votes
5G Modem
75
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
5G Modem
Cricket
The modem type provided is a 5G Modem, which supports fast wireless connectivity over the emerging 5G cellular networks.
The technology type of the modem provided or required for the service.
In the battle of Modem Type,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Modem Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Equipment Rental Fee
What is the equipment rental fee?
34
Cricket
0Votes
None
75
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
$0
Metro by T-Mobile
Equipment rental fee is $0, indicating either the provider supplies equipment at no recurring cost or rental is not charged for this plan.
Monthly cost to rent the ISP's hardware.
In the battle of Equipment Rental Fee,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equipment Rental Fee on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Equipment Purchase Option
Is there an equipment purchase option?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
An equipment purchase option is available, allowing customers to buy hardware instead of renting it.
Indicates whether the customer can buy the equipment outright.
In the battle of Equipment Purchase Option,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equipment Purchase Option on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Gateway Device Type
What is the gateway device type?
54
Cricket
0Votes
Separate Modem & Router
45
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Separate Modem & Router
Cricket
The gateway device configuration consists of separate modem and router units, which can offer more flexibility and potentially better network performance.
Identifies the type of gateway hardware setup.
In the battle of Gateway Device Type,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gateway Device Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
WiFi Standard
What WiFi standard is supported?
54
Cricket
0Votes
WiFi 6
60
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
WiFi 6
vs
WiFi Standard
Both Cricket and Metro utilize WiFi 6 standard, delivering improved speed, range, and device capacity for modern wireless networks.
The supported WiFi generation of the included hardware.
In the battle of WiFi Standard,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
WiFi Standard on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
UPS/Backup Power Support
Does the hardware support backup power?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
vs
UPS/Backup Power Support
Cricket does not provide UPS or backup power support, while Metro explicitly lists no UPS support either, indicating a similar limitation for power outage resilience with both.
Whether the hardware supports battery backup or UPS integration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
UPS/Backup Power Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Hardware Warranty
What is the hardware warranty period?
12
months
0Votes
12
months
0Votes
vs
Hardware Warranty
Hardware warranty is 12 months for both Cricket and Metro, providing a year of equipment protection which is standard in the industry.
Duration of the warranty on provided hardware.
In the battle of Hardware Warranty,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
equal
12.00 months
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hardware Warranty on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Self-Install Hardware Kit
Is a self-install hardware kit included?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Indicates whether a do-it-yourself installation kit is included.
In the battle of Self-Install Hardware Kit,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Install Hardware Kit on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Router Type
What is the router type?
0
Cricket
0Votes
Not Applicable
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Not Applicable
Specifies the type of router included or supported.
In the battle of Router Type,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Router Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Ethernet Port Count
How many Ethernet ports are available?
0
Cricket
0Votes
0
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
0
Number of wired Ethernet ports available.
In the battle of Ethernet Port Count,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ethernet Port Count on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Ethernet Port Speed
What is the Ethernet port speed?
0
Gbps
0Votes
0
Gbps
0Votes
Maximum speed supported by the Ethernet ports.
In the battle of Ethernet Port Speed,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ethernet Port Speed on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
WiFi Band Support
What WiFi bands are supported?
32
Cricket
0Votes
2.4 GHz, 5 GHz
20
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
2.4 GHz, 5 GHz
Lists supported wireless frequency bands.
In the battle of WiFi Band Support,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
WiFi Band Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
External Antenna Support
Does the hardware support external antennas?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Indicates whether external WiFi antennas can be added.
In the battle of External Antenna Support,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Antenna Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Mesh Network Compatibility
Is the hardware compatible with mesh networks?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
vs
Mesh Network Compatibility
Mesh network compatibility is not supported by either Cricket or Metro, which may limit WiFi coverage expansions at larger properties.
Indicates whether the hardware works with mesh WiFi systems.
In the battle of Mesh Network Compatibility,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mesh Network Compatibility on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Technician entry is not required for typical service events, so many issues and installations can be resolved without an on-site visit.
Indicates whether a technician must enter the customer’s home.
In the battle of Technician Entry Requirement,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technician Entry Requirement on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Time customers must wait for a technician appointment.
In the battle of Installation Appointment Wait Time,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Appointment Wait Time on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Duration
What is the installation duration?
10
minutes
0Votes
10
minutes
0Votes
Cricket
Installation duration typically takes around 10 minutes, indicating a quick setup process which minimizes waiting time for customers.
Metro by T-Mobile
Installation duration is about 10 minutes for standard self-setup scenarios.
This short time indicates a simple provisioning process or plug-and-play equipment.
Total time required to complete installation.
In the battle of Installation Duration,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
equal
10.00 minutes
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Duration on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Self-Installation Difficulty
What is the self-installation difficulty?
94
Cricket
0Votes
Easy
85
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Easy
Metro by T-Mobile
Self-installation difficulty is rated Easy, indicating most customers can set up the service without professional help.
Describes difficulty level of DIY installation.
In the battle of Self-Installation Difficulty,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Installation Difficulty on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Fee
What is the installation fee?
74
Cricket
0Votes
None
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
$0
Metro by T-Mobile
Installation fee is $0, meaning there is no charge for standard setup in the advertised offering.
Cost charged for the installation service.
In the battle of Installation Fee,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
74 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Fee on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Guide Quality
What is the setup guide quality?
69
Cricket
0Votes
Good
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Good
Cricket
Setup guide quality is rated Good, suggesting clear and helpful instructions are provided for installation.
Quality of instructions provided for installation.
In the battle of Setup Guide Quality,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
34 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Guide Quality on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Professional Installation Availability,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Installation Availability on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Wall Drilling Requirement
Is wall drilling required?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether drilling or modifications are needed during installation.
In the battle of Wall Drilling Requirement,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wall Drilling Requirement on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Equipment Activation Method
What is the equipment activation method?
64
Cricket
0Votes
App Activation
55
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
App Activation
How the provided equipment is activated.
In the battle of Equipment Activation Method,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equipment Activation Method on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
ONT Placement Requirement
Is there an ONT placement requirement?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether specific placement of the Optical Network Terminal (ONT) is required for optimal service.
In the battle of ONT Placement Requirement,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ONT Placement Requirement on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Wiring Requirement
What is the wiring requirement?
0
Cricket
0Votes
None
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
None
Type of wiring needed for installation.
In the battle of Wiring Requirement,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wiring Requirement on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Metro also beats Cricket in congestion performance with a score of 80 compared to Cricket's 70 for smoother peak time use.
See more
QoS Guarantee Level
What is the QoS guarantee level?
54
Cricket
0Votes
Medium
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Medium
Cricket
This service provides a Medium level QoS Guarantee, aiming to balance network resource allocation across users for stable performance.
Metro by T-Mobile
QoS guarantee level is Medium, indicating a balanced approach to traffic prioritization with moderate assurances for performance-sensitive applications.
The level of quality of service guaranteed by the provider.
In the battle of QoS Guarantee Level,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
QoS Guarantee Level on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Uptime Percentage
What is the uptime percentage?
99
%
0Votes
99
%
0Votes
Cricket
An uptime percentage of 99% ensures reliable connectivity with minimal downtime, important for consistent internet access.
The percentage of time the network is operational.
In the battle of Uptime Percentage,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
equal
99.00 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Uptime Percentage on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Infrastructure Age
How old is the network infrastructure?
10
years
0Votes
5
years
1Votes
The age of the network infrastructure.
In the battle of Infrastructure Age,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
5.0 years
measurement.
Based on community votes for Infrastructure Age,
Cricket ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉,
which got 1 votes.
70
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Two-Factor Authentication, Password Protection
Metro by T-Mobile
Account security includes Two-Factor Authentication and Password Protection, which help reduce unauthorized access.
These measures are standard for protecting customer accounts and typical for consumer-focused ISPs.
The security features in place to protect user accounts.
In the battle of Account Security Features,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Account Security Features on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
WiFi Guest Network Support
Is there WiFi guest network support?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Metro by T-Mobile
Wi‑Fi guest network support is not available, so guest devices may need to share the same primary network or be managed via other means.
Whether the provider offers support for setting up a guest WiFi network.
In the battle of WiFi Guest Network Support,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
WiFi Guest Network Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Malware Protection
Is anti-malware protection provided?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the provider offers anti-malware protection to secure the network.
In the battle of Anti-Malware Protection,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Malware Protection on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Parental Control Availability
Is parental control available?
No
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the provider offers parental controls to monitor and restrict online content.
In the battle of Parental Control Availability,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Parental Control Availability on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
VPN Compatibility
Is VPN compatibility supported?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the provider supports VPN usage to encrypt user traffic.
In the battle of VPN Compatibility,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
VPN Compatibility on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Privacy Policy Rating
How would you rate the privacy policy?
54
Cricket
0Votes
Good
18
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Good
A rating based on how well the provider respects and protects user privacy.
In the battle of Privacy Policy Rating,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
36 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Privacy Policy Rating on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
A rating based on overall customer feedback regarding service quality.
In the battle of Customer Satisfaction Rating,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Satisfaction Rating on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels
What support channels are available?
52
Cricket
0Votes
Phone, Live Chat, Social Media
42
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Phone, Live Chat, Social Media
Cricket
Support channels include Phone, Live Chat, and Social Media, providing diverse options for customer assistance.
Metro by T-Mobile
Support channels include Phone, Live Chat, and Social Media, giving multiple real-time and asynchronous ways to contact support.
The available channels for contacting customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Troubleshooting Capability
Is remote troubleshooting available?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
Remote troubleshooting capability exists, which helps in diagnosing and fixing technical issues without needing an on-site visit.
Whether the provider offers remote troubleshooting for technical issues.
In the battle of Remote Troubleshooting Capability,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Troubleshooting Capability on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Support Quality Rating
How would you rate the support quality?
69
Cricket
0Votes
Good
60
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Good
Cricket
Support quality is rated Good, reflecting satisfactory customer service and technical assistance.
A rating based on the overall quality of customer support provided.
In the battle of Support Quality Rating,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Quality Rating on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Knowledge Base Quality
How would you rate the knowledge base?
69
Cricket
0Votes
Good
60
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Good
Metro by T-Mobile
The knowledge base quality is rated Good, meaning documentation and help articles are generally helpful for self-service troubleshooting.
The quality of the self-help resources provided in the knowledge base.
In the battle of Knowledge Base Quality,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Knowledge Base Quality on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Mobile App Support
Is mobile app support available?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
Mobile app support is provided, making it easier for customers to manage their accounts and services on their smartphones.
Whether the provider offers a mobile app for managing the service.
In the battle of Mobile App Support,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mobile App Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Chatbot Support
Is chatbot support available?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
Chatbot support is included, allowing users to get quick automated assistance for their service needs.
Whether the provider uses a chatbot to assist customers.
In the battle of Chatbot Support,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Chatbot Support on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Support Availability Hours
What are the support availability hours?
44
Cricket
0Votes
Business Hours
85
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
24/7
The hours during which customer support is available.
In the battle of Support Availability Hours,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Availability Hours on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Multilingual Support Availability
Is multilingual support available?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the provider offers multilingual support for non-native speakers.
In the battle of Multilingual Support Availability,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multilingual Support Availability on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Technician Response Time
How quickly do technicians respond?
0
hours
0Votes
0
hours
0Votes
The time taken for a technician to respond to a support request.
In the battle of Technician Response Time,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technician Response Time on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Claim Process
What is the warranty claim process?
44
Cricket
0Votes
Moderate
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Moderate
The ease of the warranty claim process for customers.
In the battle of Warranty Claim Process,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Claim Process on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Whether the contract automatically renews after the initial term.
In the battle of Auto-Renewal Policy,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto-Renewal Policy on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Contract Type
What type of contract is offered?
94
Cricket
0Votes
No Contract
85
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
No Contract
Cricket
The contract type is No Contract, which offers flexibility without binding customers to long-term commitments.
The type of contract offered for the service.
In the battle of Contract Type,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Contract Type on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Contract Duration
What is the contract duration?
0
months
0Votes
0
months
0Votes
The duration for which the contract is valid.
In the battle of Contract Duration,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Contract Duration on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Rate Lock Duration
What is the rate lock duration?
0
months
0Votes
1
months
0Votes
The period during which the monthly rate is locked in.
In the battle of Rate Lock Duration,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rate Lock Duration on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Speed Guarantee Policy
Is there a speed guarantee?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the provider guarantees a specific internet speed.
In the battle of Speed Guarantee Policy,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Speed Guarantee Policy on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Early Termination Fee
What is the early termination fee?
4
Cricket
0Votes
None
5
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
$0
The fee charged if the contract is terminated before the agreed-upon date.
In the battle of Early Termination Fee,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Early Termination Fee on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Cancellation Policy
What is the cancellation policy?
0
Cricket
0Votes
None
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
None
The policy governing the cancellation of the service.
In the battle of Cancellation Policy,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cancellation Policy on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Pause Service Option
Can the service be paused?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the provider allows customers to pause their service temporarily.
In the battle of Pause Service Option,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pause Service Option on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Acceptable Use Restrictions
What are the acceptable use restrictions?
44
Cricket
0Votes
Fair Use
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Fair Use
The rules or restrictions placed on how the service can be used.
In the battle of Acceptable Use Restrictions,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acceptable Use Restrictions on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Web Hosting Add-On,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Web Hosting Add-On on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Loyalty Rewards
Are loyalty rewards offered?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Cricket
Loyalty rewards program is offered, incentivizing continued use of the service through benefits or discounts.
Perks for long-term subscribers like discounts or upgrades
In the battle of Loyalty Rewards,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Loyalty Rewards on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Static IP
Is a static IP available?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether a static IP can be added to the service
In the battle of Static IP,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Static IP on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Public IP
Is a public IP available?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the account receives a true public IP address
In the battle of Public IP,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Public IP on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Email Account Add-On
Are email accounts provided?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether ISP provides email accounts as an add-on
In the battle of Email Account Add-On,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Email Account Add-On on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Storage Add-On
Is cloud storage offered?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Optional cloud storage service bundled with plan
In the battle of Cloud Storage Add-On,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Storage Add-On on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
TV Bundle Compatibility
Is TV bundling supported?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the service can be bundled with TV packages
In the battle of TV Bundle Compatibility,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
TV Bundle Compatibility on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Phone Bundle Compatibility
Is phone bundling supported?
No
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether internet can be bundled with VoIP or phone service
In the battle of Phone Bundle Compatibility,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phone Bundle Compatibility on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Home Integration
Is smart home integration supported?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Support for ISP-provided smart devices or automation
In the battle of Smart Home Integration,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Home Integration on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Gaming Optimization Feature
Is gaming optimization available?
No
0Votes
Cricket
No
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Enhancements for lower ping or optimized routing
In the battle of Gaming Optimization Feature,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gaming Optimization Feature on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Seasonal Promo
Are seasonal promos available?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether the ISP regularly offers seasonal discounts or promos
In the battle of Seasonal Promo,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Seasonal Promo on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
55
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Credit Card, Debit Card, Bank Transfer, eWallet
Cricket
Payment methods supported are Credit Card, Debit Card, and eWallets, offering flexibility in billing.
Metro by T-Mobile
Accepted payment methods include Credit Card, Debit Card, Bank Transfer, and eWallet, giving multiple options for billing.
Ways customers can pay their bill
In the battle of Payment Methods,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Payment Methods on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Promotional Price Duration
How long does the promotional price last?
1
months
0Votes
1
months
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Promotional pricing lasts 1 month, after which standard rates typically apply.
Length of time promotional pricing applies
In the battle of Promotional Price Duration,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
equal
1.00 months
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Promotional Price Duration on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Account Management
Is multi-account management supported?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Metro by T-Mobile
Multi-account management is supported, allowing households or small organizations to manage multiple service accounts under a single administrative view.
Ability to manage multiple accounts under one profile
In the battle of Multi-Account Management,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Account Management on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Subscription Management Tools
Are subscription management tools provided?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Metro by T-Mobile
Subscription management tools are available, allowing customers to adjust plans, manage billing, and view account details online.
Tools to modify plans, add-ons, or upgrades
In the battle of Subscription Management Tools,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Subscription Management Tools on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Billing Cycle
What is the billing cycle?
94
Cricket
0Votes
Monthly
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Monthly
Defines how often customers are billed
In the battle of Billing Cycle,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
94 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Billing Cycle on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Auto-Pay
Is auto-pay supported?
Yes
0Votes
Cricket
Yes
0Votes
Metro by T-Mobile
Whether automatic payments are available
In the battle of Auto-Pay,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto-Pay on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Price Adjustment Frequency
What is the price adjustment frequency?
0
Cricket
0Votes
Rare
0
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Rare
How often the ISP changes its pricing
In the battle of Price Adjustment Frequency,
Cricket ◉ is
same as
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Price Adjustment Frequency on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Bill Transparency Rating
What is the bill transparency rating?
74
Cricket
0Votes
High
85
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
High
How clearly the bill shows charges and fees
In the battle of Bill Transparency Rating,
Cricket ◉ is
worse than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bill Transparency Rating on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Tax & Fee Breakdown Detail
How detailed is the tax & fee breakdown?
54
Cricket
0Votes
Standard
35
Metro by T-Mobile
0Votes
Standard
How clearly taxes and fees are itemized
In the battle of Tax & Fee Breakdown Detail,
Cricket ◉ is
better than
Metro by T-Mobile ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tax & Fee Breakdown Detail on Cricket ◉
vs Metro by T-Mobile ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Speed Performance
How fast is the internet connection you get with this Internet Service Provider?
Very fast — Over 1 Gbps
0Votes
0Votes
Fast — 500 Mbps to 1 Gbps
0Votes
0Votes
Average speed — 100 Mbps to 500 Mbps
0Votes
0Votes
Slow — 50 Mbps to 100 Mbps
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow — Under 50 Mbps
0Votes
0Votes
Reliability
How reliable is the internet connection with this Internet Service Provider?
Very reliable — Almost no interruptions
0Votes
0Votes
Reliable — Occasional brief interruptions
0Votes
0Votes
Average reliability — Some noticeable interruptions
0Votes
0Votes
Unreliable — Frequent outages
0Votes
0Votes
Very unreliable — Constant interruptions
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Setup
How easy is it to set up the service with this Internet Service Provider?
Very easy — Quick and straightforward setup with clear instructions
0Votes
0Votes
Easy — Simple setup, but may need some guidance
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Requires some technical know-how to set up
0Votes
0Votes
Difficult — Complicated setup process with unclear instructions
0Votes
0Votes
Very difficult — Hard to set up and requires external help
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How would you rate the pricing for this Internet Service Provider?
Great value for money — Affordable, with excellent performance
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price — Reasonably priced for the service provided
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal — Reasonable pricing, but could be better
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey — Expensive for the service received
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive — Very high prices for what you get
0Votes
0Votes
Data Allowance
How would you rate the data allowance offered by this Internet Service Provider?
Unlimited — No data limits or throttling
0Votes
0Votes
Very generous — Large data allowance with high limits
0Votes
0Votes
Fair allowance — Enough data for regular use, with occasional throttling
0Votes
0Votes
Limited — Restricted data with potential overage charges
0Votes
0Votes
Very limited — Very low data limit with frequent throttling or overage fees
0Votes
0Votes
Network Coverage
How well does the network coverage perform in your area with this Internet Service Provider?
Excellent — Strong coverage in all areas, no dead spots
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Reliable coverage in most areas, occasional weak spots
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Fair coverage with noticeable gaps in certain areas
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Frequent connectivity issues in certain areas
0Votes
0Votes
Very poor — Many areas with no service or very weak signals
0Votes
0Votes
Additional Features
How would you rate the extra features provided by this Internet Service Provider?
Excellent — Provides a wide range of useful and innovative features
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Includes several helpful features for enhanced service
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Offers basic features, but lacks some extra functionality
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Few additional features, limited value
0Votes
0Votes
Very poor — No extra features or functionality beyond the basic plan
0Votes
0Votes
Latency
How would you rate the latency (ping) with this Internet Service Provider?
Very low — Under 10ms, perfect for gaming and real-time applications
0Votes
0Votes
Low — 10ms to 30ms, good for most applications
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 30ms to 60ms, okay for general browsing
0Votes
0Votes
High — 60ms to 100ms, noticeable delays in some activities
0Votes
0Votes
Very high — Over 100ms, causes delays and issues with real-time activities
0Votes
0Votes
Bandwidth Consistency
How consistent is the bandwidth with this Internet Service Provider?
Very consistent — Speeds are stable throughout the day and night
0Votes
0Votes
Very consistent — Speeds are stable throughout the day and night
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Speeds can vary depending on the time of day
0Votes
0Votes
Inconsistent — Frequent slowdowns, especially during peak hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very inconsistent — Regular fluctuations in speed, even during non-peak times
0Votes
0Votes
Service Reliability During Peak Hours
How reliable is the service during peak hours with this Internet Service Provider?
Very reliable — No noticeable slowdowns or interruptions
0Votes
0Votes
Reliable — Occasionally slower speeds, but still usable
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Speeds significantly drop, but still functional
0Votes
0Votes
Unreliable — Frequent disruptions and noticeable slowdown during peak hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very unreliable — Service is nearly unusable during peak hours
Supermod
Moderator
0
Cartling
